Difference between revisions of "Template:Iffile"
From Self-sufficiency
m (Changed protection level for "Template:Ifimage": - cascading... no one even got a chance to improve it :/ [edit=sysop:move=sysop]) |
m (clarity) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | For use in templates that add images to categories (while | + | For use in templates that add images to categories (while having no effect in all other namespaces). Short for <code><nowiki>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Image|</nowiki></code>...<code>}}</code>. |
For example, something like <nowiki>{{ifimage|[[Category:Some media only category]]}}</nowiki> might go in a template that's only supposed to categorize images. Of course, <nowiki><includeonly></nowiki> tags aren't needed since it won't affect templates. No type of category suppression (e.g. <code>category=</code> or <code>|nocat</code>) is needed on demo/example pages either. | For example, something like <nowiki>{{ifimage|[[Category:Some media only category]]}}</nowiki> might go in a template that's only supposed to categorize images. Of course, <nowiki><includeonly></nowiki> tags aren't needed since it won't affect templates. No type of category suppression (e.g. <code>category=</code> or <code>|nocat</code>) is needed on demo/example pages either. | ||
Revision as of 02:50, 13 August 2008
For use in templates that add images to categories (while having no effect in all other namespaces). Short for {{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Image|...}}.
For example, something like {{ifimage|[[Category:Some media only category]]}} might go in a template that's only supposed to categorize images. Of course, <includeonly> tags aren't needed since it won't affect templates. No type of category suppression (e.g. category= or |nocat) is needed on demo/example pages either.
