Difference between revisions of "Nevirapine"

From Self-sufficiency
Jump to: navigation, search
m (1 revision: World Health Organization essential medicines)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 15:45, 27 September 2010

Nevirapine
File:Nevirapine.svg
File:Nevirapine 3D balls 1fkp.png
Systematic (IUPAC) name
11-cyclopropyl-4-methyl-5,11-dihydro-6H- dipyrido[3,2-b:2′,3′-e][1,4]diazepin-6-one
Clinical data
Pregnancy
category
Routes of
administration		 Oral
Pharmacokinetic data
Bioavailability 93% ± 9%
Metabolism Hepatic
Biological half-life 45 hours
Excretion Renal: <6% (Parent drug)
Biliary <5% (Parent drug)
Identifiers
CAS Number 129618-40-2
ATC code J05AG01 (WHO)
PubChem CID 4463
DrugBank APRD00705
Chemical data
Formula C15H14N4O
Molar mass 266.298 g/mol[[Script error: No such module "String".]]
  (verify)
Script error: No such module "TemplatePar".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.

Nevirapine, also marketed under the trade name Viramune (Boehringer Ingelheim), is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) used to treat HIV-1 infection and AIDS.

As with other antiretroviral drugs, HIV rapidly develops resistance if nevirapine is used alone, so recommended therapy consists of combinations of three or more antiretrovirals.

History

Nevirapine was discovered by Hargrave et al. at Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., one of the Boehringer Ingelheim group of companies. It is covered by U.S. Patent 5,366,972 and corresponding foreign patents. Nevirapine was the first NNRTI approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). It was approved June 21, 1996 for adults and September 11, 1998 for children. It was also approved in Europe in 1997.

Mode of action

Nevirapine falls in the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) class of antiretrovirals.[1] Both nucleoside and non-nucleoside RTIs inhibit the same target, the reverse transcriptase enzyme, an essential viral enzyme which transcribes viral RNA into DNA. Unlike nucleoside RTIs, which bind at the enzyme's active site, NNRTIs bind allosterically at a distinct site away from the active site termed the NNRTI pocket.

Nevirapine is not effective against HIV-2, as the pocket of the HIV-2 reverse transcriptase has a different structure, which confers intrinsic resistance to the NNRTI class.[2]

Resistance to nevirapine develops rapidly if viral replication is not completely suppressed.[3] The most common mutations observed after nevirapine treatment are Y181C and K103N, which are also observed with other NNRTIs.[4][5] As all NNRTIs bind within the same pocket, viral strains which are resistant to nevirapine are usually also resistant to the other NNRTIs, efavirenz and delavirdine.

Clinical efficacy

Nevirapine in triple combination therapy has been shown to suppress viral load effectively when used as initial antiretroviral therapy (i.e., in antiretroviral-naive patients).[3] Some clinical trials have demonstrated comparable HIV suppression with nevirapine-based regimens to that achieved with protease inhibitors (PIs)[6][7] or efavirenz.[8] Although concerns have been raised about nevirapine-based regimens in those starting therapy with high viral load or low CD4 count, some analyses suggest that nevirapine may be effective in these patients.[8]

Nevirapine may also form a useful component of salvage regimens after virological failure, usually in combination with one or more PIs as well as nRTIs, especially in those who have not previously taken an NNRTI.

Adverse effects

The most common adverse effect of nevirapine is the development of mild or moderate rash (13%).[4][9] Severe or life-threatening skin reactions have been observed in 1.5% of patients, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis and hypersensitivity.[4]

Nevirapine may cause severe or life-threatening liver toxicity, usually emerging in the first six weeks of treatment.[4][10] In 2000, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a black box label on nevirapine, warning that it could cause severe liver damage, including liver failure.[11] Unacceptably high risk of serious liver symptoms in certain patient groups (women with CD4 count >250 and men >400)[8][12] has led the U.S. DHSS to recommend the restriction of nevirapine use to those at lower risk, unless the benefit to the patient clearly outweighs the risk;[10] although in the 2NN study which found these CD4 limits, the effect was seen only in patients recruited from Thailand. More recent studies on the use of Nevirapine in people with higher CD4 cell counts have come to the following conclusion: Treatment-experienced patients who start NVP-based combination therapy with low pre–ART and high current CD4 cell counts and an undetectable VL have a similar likelihood for discontinuing NVP therapy because of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs), compared with treatment-naive patients with low CD4 cell counts. This suggests that NVP-based combination therapy may be safely initiated in such patients. However, in similar patients with a detectable VL, it is prudent to continue to adhere to current CD4 cell count thresholds. [13] The U.S. Public Health Service Task Force advocates caution in the use of nevirapine in pregnancy due to toxicity issues, which may be exacerbated during pregnancy.[14]

Drug interactions

Significant lowering of nevirapine levels occurs with the anti-tuberculosis drug, rifampicin, and the drugs should not be administered together.[4]

Nevirapine is an inducer of cytochrome P450 isoenzymes CYP3A4 and CYP2B6. It reduces the levels of several co-administered drugs including the antiretrovirals efavirenz, indinavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir and saquinavir, as well as clarithromycin, ketoconazole, forms of hormonal contraception, and methadone.[4]

Preventing mother-to-child transmission

A single dose of nevirapine given to both mother and child reduced the rate of HIV transmission by almost 50% compared with a very short course of zidovudine (AZT) prophylaxis, in a clinical trial in Uganda.[15] A subsequent study in Thailand showed that prophylaxis with single-dose nevirapine in addition to zidovudine is more effective than zidovudine alone.[16] These and other trials have led the World Health Organization to endorse the use of single-dose nevirapine prophylaxis in many developing world settings as a cost-effective way of reducing mother-to-child transmission. However, in the United States the Ugandan study was deemed flawed [17] and as of 2006 the FDA has not approved of such nevirapine prophylaxis.[18] Another clinical trial, Using Nevirapine to Prevent Mother-to-Child HIV Transmission During Breastfeeding is scheduled for completion in March 2011.[19]

A major concern with this approach is that NNRTI resistance mutations are commonly observed in both mothers and infants after single-dose nevirapine,[20] and may compromise the response to future NNRTI-containing regimens.[21] A short course of maternal zidovudine/lamivudine is recommended by the U.S. Public Health Service Task Force to reduce this risk.[14]

Controversy in Africa

U.S. President George W. Bush's $500 million plan to help combat the African AIDS epidemic includes nevirapine, among other medications and programs. Nevirapine has also been tested in trials in Africa, some of which have been highly controversial.

Former President of South Africa Thabo Mbeki accused the United States of using Africans as "guinea pigs".[22] Questions regarding the efficacy of the antiretroviral nevirapine when compared with its side effects were the main stated reason for President Mbeki's concern. Until recently, however, Mbeki endorsed claims by some scientists that HIV is not the cause of AIDS—findings which are considered well outside the realm of reasonable scientific thought by the vast majority of the scientific community.[23]

Chemistry

800px

Hargrave, K. D.; Peoudfoot, J. R.; Grozinger, K. G.; Cullen, E.; Kapadia, S. R.; Patel, J. R.; Fuchs, V. U.; Mauldin, S. C.; Vitous, S. J.; Behnke, M. L.; et al.; J. Med. Chem. 1991, 34, 2231.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm00111a045

References

Cite error: Invalid <references> tag; parameter "group" is allowed only.

Use <references />, or <references group="..." />
Antiviral drugs: antiretroviral drugs used against HIV (primarily J05)
Entry/fusion inhibitors
(Discovery & development)
Reverse transcriptase
inhibitors (RTIs)
(1st gen) Efavirenz°# · Nevirapine#  · Loviride◊ · Delavirdine◊ ·
(2nd gen) diarylpyrimidines (Etravirine, Rilpivirine†)  · Lersivirine†
Integrase inhibitors
Raltegravir · Elvitegravir† · Globoidnan A (experimental)  · MK-2048†  · GSK-572†
Maturation inhibitors
Bevirimat† · Vivecon†
Protease Inhibitors (PI)
(Discovery and development)
Combined formulations
Experimental agents
TRIM5alpha (gene)
Other
Failed agents
°DHHS preferred first-line agent. ◊Formerly or rarely used agent.
de:Nevirapin

es:Nevirapina fr:Névirapine it:Nevirapina pl:Newirapina

th:นีวิราปีน
  1. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Citation/CS1/Suggestions' not found.
  2. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Citation/CS1/Suggestions' not found.
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Citation/CS1/Suggestions' not found.
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 Viramune (nevirapine) tablets; Viramune (nevirapine) oral suspension prescribing information
  5. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Citation/CS1/Suggestions' not found.
  6. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Citation/CS1/Suggestions' not found.
  7. ↑ Podzamczer D, Ferrer E, Consiglio E. "A randomized clinical trial comparing nelfinavir or nevirapine associated to zidovudine/lamivudine in HIV-infected naive patients (the Combine Study)". Antiviral Ther. 7: 81–90. 
  8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Citation/CS1/Suggestions' not found.
  9. ↑ "Facts sheet from the AIDS Treatment Data Network". Retrieved 2006-01-16. 
  10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 DHHS panel. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents (May 4, 2006). (Available for download from AIDSInfo)
  11. ↑ Viramune (nevirapine) letter (November 2000)
  12. ↑ Stern JO, Robinson PA, Love J, Lanes S, Imperiale MS, Mayers DL (2003). "A comprehensive hepatic safety analysis of nevirapine in different populations of HIV-infected patients". J Acquir Immune Defc Syndr. 34 (Suppl 1): S21–S33. doi:10.1097/00126334-200309011-00005. 
  13. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Citation/CS1/Suggestions' not found.
  14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 Recommendations for Use of Antiretroviral Drugs in Pregnant HIV-1-Infected Women for Maternal Health and Interventions to Reduce Perinatal HIV-1 Transmission in the United States. Public Health Service Task Force. (November 17, 2005) (Available for download from AIDSInfo)
  15. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Citation/CS1/Suggestions' not found.
  16. ↑ Lallemant M, Gonzague Jourdain G, Sophie Le Coeur S, et al. (2004) Single-Dose Perinatal Nevirapine plus Standard Zidovudine to Prevent Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV-1 in Thailand. N Engl J Med 351: 217-28
  17. ↑ The HIVNET 012 Study and the Safety and Effectiveness of Nevirapine in Preventing Mother-to-Infant Transmission of HIV, http://www3.niaid.nih.gov/news/newsreleases/2004/hivnet012.htm
  18. ↑ Celia Farber, "Out of Control: AIDS and the Corruption of Science" http://www.harpers.org/archive/2006/03/0080961
  19. ↑ http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00074412
  20. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Citation/CS1/Suggestions' not found.
  21. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Citation/CS1/Suggestions' not found.
  22. ↑ "Nevirapine Controversy". Retrieved 2006-01-16. 
  23. ↑ "AEGiS-M&G: Mbeki's Aids Letter Defies Belief". Retrieved 2006-04-12. 
Retrieved from "http://ssf.f15ijp.com/wiki/index.php?title=Nevirapine&oldid=42580"