Difference between revisions of "Guantanamo military commission"

Revision as of 07:27, 27 September 2010 (view source) RjwilmsiBot (Talk) m (→‎The lawyers: CiteCompletion, {{dead link}}s: 1 using AWB (7192))	Latest revision as of 16:29, 27 September 2010 (view source) Jontas (Talk | contribs) m (1 revision)
(No difference)

---

Latest revision as of 16:29, 27 September 2010

42px	This article's factual accuracy may be compromised because of out-of-date information. Please help improve the article by updating it. There may be additional information on the talk page.

This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. Please help improve the article with a good introductory style. (April 2010)

The Guantanamo military commissions are military tribunals created by the Military Commissions Act of 2006 for prosecuting detainees held in the United States Guantanamo Bay detainment camps.

History

The American Bar Association announced in 2002 during the Bush administration that: "In response to the unprecedented attacks of September 11, on November 13, 2001, the President announced that certain non-citizens (of the USA) would be subject to detention and trial by military authorities. The order provides that non-citizens whom the President deems to be, or to have been, members of the al Qaeda organization or to have engaged in, aided or abetted, or conspired to commit acts of international terrorism that have caused, threaten to cause, or have as their aim to cause, injury to or adverse effects on the United States or its citizens, or to have knowingly harbored such individuals, are subject to detention by military authorities and trial before a military commission."^[1]

On September 28 and September 29, 2006, the US Senate and US House of Representatives, respectively, passed the Military Commissions Act of 2006, a controversial bill that allows the President to designate certain people with the status of "unlawful enemy combatants" thus making them subject to military commissions, where they have fewer civil rights than in regular trials.

On June 29, 2006, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in the case "Hamdan v. Rumsfeld" Docket 05-194, with a 5-3 decision for Salim Ahmed Hamdan, effectively declaring that trying Guantanamo Bay detainees under the Guantanamo military commission (known also as Military Tribunal) was illegal under US law, including the Geneva Conventions.^[2]

Quoting the opinion (Paragraph 4, page 4), "4. The military commission at issue lacks the power to proceed because its structure and procedures violate both the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice) and the four Geneva Conventions signed in 1949." Ultimately the Supreme Court ruled that President George W. Bush does not have the sole authority to hold tribunals and is required to get authorization to do so from the United States Congress.

With the War Crimes Act in mind, this ruling presented the Bush administration with the risk of criminal liability for war crimes. To address these legal problems, among other reasons, the Military Commissions Act was adopted.^[3]

Comparison with the American justice system

The United States has two parallel justice systems, with laws, statutes, precedents, rules of evidence, and paths for appeal. Under these justice systems prisoners have certain rights. They have a right to know the evidence against them; they have a right to protect themselves against self-incrimination; they have a right to legal counsel; they have a right to have the witnesses against them cross-examined.

The two parallel justice systems are the Judicial Branch of the US Government, and a slightly streamlined justice system named the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice) for people under military jurisdiction. People undergoing a military court martial are entitled to the same basic rights as those in the civilian justice system.

The Guantanamo military trials do not operate according to either system of justice. The differences include:

• Unlike civilian courts, only two-thirds of the jury needs to agree in order to convict someone under the military commission rules. This includes charges such as supporting terrorism, attempted murder, and murder.^[4]

• The accused are not allowed access to all the evidence against them. The Presiding Officers are authorized to consider secret evidence the accused have no opportunity to refute.^[5]

• It may be possible for the commission to consider evidence that was extracted through coercive interrogation techniques before the enactment of the Detainee Treatment Act.^[6] However, legally the commission is restricted from considering any evidence extracted by torture, as defined by the Department of Defense.^[7]
• The Appointing Officer in overall charge of the commissions is sitting in on them. He is authorized to shut down any commission, without warning, and without explanation.^{[citation needed]}
• The proceedings may be closed at the discretion of the Presiding Officer, so that secret information may be discussed by the commission.^[8]
• The accused are not permitted a free choice of attorneys, as they can only use military lawyers or those civilian attorneys eligible for the Secret security clearance.^[9]
• Because the accused are charged as unlawful combatants, former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld stated that an acquittal on all charges by the commission is no guarantee of a release.^[10]

Commission Cases

Name	Charges	Verdict	Dates
David Hicks	Providing material support for terrorism[11]	Found guilty, sentenced to seven years in prison (only served nine months of penalty, mostly in Australia, under terms of plea agreement)	Charged: February 3, 2007[11] Sentenced: March 30, 2007 Arrived in Australia: May 20, 2007 Released: December 29, 2007
Salim Hamdan	Conspiracy; providing material support for terrorism	Acquitted on conspiracy charge; found guilty for providing material support and sentenced to five and a half years (66 months) in prison (credited for 61 months in detention)	Captured: November 24, 2001 Charged: May 10, 2007 Sentenced: August 7, 2008
Ali Hamza al-Bahlul	conspiracy, solicitation to commit murder, and providing material support for terrorism	Sentenced to life imprisonment without parole	Charged: February 9, 2008 Sentenced: November 4, 2008[12]
Ibrahim al Qosi			Captured: December 2001
Omar Khadr	Murder in violation of the law of war; attempted murder in violation of the law of war; conspiracy; providing material support for terrorism; spying		Charged: February 2, 2007
Sufyian Barhoumi
Ghassan al-Shirbi
Jabran al-Qahtani
Benyam Mohammed		All charges dropped
Abdul Zahir
Mohamed Jawad	Three counts of attempted murder; three counts of committing serious bodily harm	All charges withdrawn and dismissed.	Charged: October 11, 2007 Won his habeas corpus: July 30, 2009. Charges withdrawn and dismissed: 31 July 2009.

Boycott of Military Commissions

In 2006, after charges were laid against a number of detainees a boycott against the judicial hearings was declared by Ali al-Bahlul. The boycott gained momentum in 2008 when more detainees faced Guantanamo military commissions. Public confidence in the fairness of the trials reached all-time lows after the boycotts began.^{[13][clarification needed]}

The commission members

Initially the identity of the commission members were to be kept hidden, and the commission was to consist of a Presiding Officer (a lawyer), at least four other officers (between eight and eleven in capital cases), and one alternate.

The structure of the commission was radically revised in late 2004. The impartiality of five of the officers was challenged, and two of the officers were removed. All five officers of the commission have an equal vote, the Presiding Officer performs the additional role of administering the trial, much as a judge would in a civil trial.

Peter Brownback	Colonel (retired)	President of the Commissions for David Hicks, Salim Hamdan The only lawyer on the commission. A long time friend of the appointing officer. Brownback was criticized for not being an active member of a state bar.
Christopher Bogdan	Colonel USAF	Member of the Commissions for David Hicks, Salim Hamdan Only commission member who was not challenged.
R. Thomas Bright	Colonel USMC	Member of the Commissions for David Hicks, Salim Hamdan Challenged because he assembled lists of detainees bound for Guantánamo and executed war plans in Afghanistan.[14] Remains on the commission.
Curt S. Cooper	lieutenant colonel U.S. Army	Member of the Commissions for David Hicks, Salim Hamdan Admitted referring to the Guantánamo detainees as "terrorists". Admitted being unfamiliar with the Geneva Conventions. Removed from the commission.
Jack K. Sparks Jr.	Colonel USMC	Member of the Commissions for David Hicks, Salim Hamdan Membership was challenged because he lost a subordinate during the attacks of September 11, 2001. Remains on the commission.
Timothy K. Toomey	lieutenant colonel USAF	Member of the Commissions for David Hicks, Salim Hamdan An intelligence officer who was involved in the capture of suspects in Afghanistan. Removed from the commission.
Ralph Kohlmann	Colonel USMC	President of the Commissions for Binyam Ahmed Muhammad and Ghassan Abdullah Al-Sharbi

Legal advisors

There have been three individuals who have held the position of legal advisor to the civilian in charge of the Office of Military Commissions: Brigadier General Thomas Hemingway, Brigadier General Thomas W. Hartmann and Colonel Michael Chapman.

The lawyers

John D. Altenburg	General (retired)	Appointing authority Will attend all the commissions Has the authority to shut down any commission, immediately, without warning or explanation.
Thomas Hemingway	Brigadier General	Legal advisor to the Office of Military Commissions
Peter Brownback	Colonel (retired)	Commission President (see above)
Ralph Kohlmann	Colonel USMC	Commission President (see above)
Fred Borch	Colonel	Chief Prosecutor Leaked memos surfaced that claimed he had bragged about corrupting the fairness of the proceedings. Reported to have claimed the Commission officers were chosen because they could be trusted to convict Reported to have claimed that all the evidence of the suspect's innocence would be classified top-secret, so the defense never learned of it. Resigned his commission.
Robert L. Swann	Colonel	Chief Prosecutor following Fred Borch. Requested two of the commission officers be removed because they would be biased in favor of conviction.
Dwight H. Sullivan	Colonel USMC Reserve	Appointed to be chief defense counsel Called up from civilian life for this service Worked for the Maryland office of the American Civil Liberties Union in civilian life.
Muneer Ahmad	civilian	Defending Omar Khadr Professor of law Pro bono service Described great difficulties put in his path by military authorities.[15]
Robert Chester	Colonel	Prosecuting Omar Khadr[16]
John Carr	Captain	Appointed to serve as a Prosecutor Requested transfer because the proceeding seemed unjust. Promoted after transfer
Morris Davis	Colonel U.S. Air Force	Prosecutor for Omar Khadr
Thomas Fleener	major Army Reserve	Appointed to defend Ali Hamza Ahmed Sulayman al Bahlul Bahlul has consistently insisted on his right to defend himself.
William C. Kuebler	Lieutenant Commander U.S. Navy	Appointed to defend Ghassan Abdullah Al Sharbi Al Sharbi insisted on his right to defend himself.
John Merriam	Captain U.S. Army	Appointed to defend Omar Khadr
Michael Mori	major USMC Reserve	Appointed to defend David Matthew Hicks
Robert Preston	major	Appointed to serve as a Prosecutor Requested transfer because the proceeding seemed unjust. Promoted after transfer
Robert D. Rachlin	civilian	Volunteered to defend Ghassan Abdullah al Sharbi
Sharon Shaffer	—	Appointed to defend Ibrahim Ahmed Mahmoud al Qosi
Philip Sundel	—	Appointed to defend Ali Hamza Ahmed Sulayman al Bahlul Bahlul has consistently insisted on his right to defend himself.
Charles Swift	Lieutenant Commander	Appointed to serve as Salim Ahmed Hamdan's defense counsel
Carrie Wolf	Captain USAF	Appointed to serve as a Prosecutor Requested transfer because the proceeding seemed unjust. Promoted after transfer

Security precautions

On January 2, 2008 Toronto Star reporter Michelle Shephard offered an account of the security precautions reporters go through before they can attend the hearings^[17]:

• Reporters were only allowed to bring in one pen;
• Female reporters were frisked if they wore underwire bras;
• Reporters were not allowed to bring in their traditional coil-ring notepads;
• The bus bringing reporters to the hearing room is checked for explosives before it leaves;
• 200 metres from the hearing room reporters dismount, pass through metal detectors, and are sniffed by chemical detectors for signs of exposure to explosives;
• Only eight reporters are allowed into the hearing room—the remainder watch over closed circuit TV;

Suspension and possible revival

On January 22, 2009, new US President Barack Obama, who had said during his 2008 campaign that he would reject the Military Commissions Act if elected,^[3] issued an executive order instructing the Secretary of Defense to immediately take steps sufficient to ensure that no new charges are sworn, or referred to a military commission under the Military Commissions Act of 2006 and the Rules for Military Commissions, and that all proceedings of such military commissions to which charges have been referred but in which no judgment has been rendered, and all proceedings pending in the United States Court of Military Commission Review, are halted.^[18]

On January 29, 2009 the order was overturned. Guantanamo military commission judge, Army Colonel James Pohl, ruled against the order in the case of Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri. Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri is one of three Guantanamo Bay inmates known to have been tortured by water-boarding.^[19]

In May 2009, The New York Times reported that the Obama administration is considering the tribunals as an alternative to trying detainees in the regular court system.^[3]

Costs

According to Hindustan Times the electronic equipment that was installed in courtroom number 2 cost $4 million USD.^[20]

See also

40x40px

Wikinews has related news: U.S. military tribunals in Guantanamo Bay lack Congressional authorization, violate US law

40x40px

Wikisource has original text related to this article: Detention, Treatment, and Trial of Certain Non-Citizens in the War Against Terrorism

• List of resignations from the Guantanamo military commission
• Boycott of Guantanamo Military Commissions
• Combatant Status Review Tribunal
• Administrative Review Board
• Command responsibility
• court martial
• Geneva Conventions
• Illegal combatant
• Jus ad bellum
• Jus in bello
• Lawfare
• Military law
• War on Terror
• Military Police: Enemy Prisoners of War, Retained Personnel, Civilian Internees and Other Detainees

References

External links

• Official Site
• "Defense Department Picks Officials for Military Tribunal Posts: Appointing authority, legal advisor, review panel members named". United States Department of Defense. December 30, 2003. Retrieved 2007-10-14. 
• Amnesty International
• John D. Altenburg, Defense Department Briefing on Military Commission Hearings, Department of Defense, August 17, 2004
• Military Tribunals: Historical Patterns and Lessons, CRS Report for Congress July 9, 2004
• James Meek, US fires Guantánamo defence team, The Guardian, December 3, 2003
• American Bar Association Task Force on Terrorism and the Law Report and Recommendations on Military Commissions: January 4, 2002(PDF)
• At Gitmo, still no day in court: How feds avoid hearings for terror suspects — despite Supreme Court ruling, Newsday, June 15, 2005
• Leaked emails claim Guantánamo trials rigged Australian Broadcasting Corporation August 1, 2005*Leaked emails claim Guantánamo trials rigged Australian Broadcasting Corporation August 1, 2005
• UK resident released from Guantanamo, Breaking Legal news, April 1, 2007
• Rules Are Strict for Journalists Covering Gitmo
• Human Rights First; Undue Process: An Examination of Detention and Trials of Bagram Detainees in Afghanistan in April 2009 (2009)
• Human Rights First; Arbitrary Justice: Trial of Guantánamo and Bagram Detainees in Afghanistan (2008)
• Human Rights First: In Pursuit of Justice; Prosecuting Terrorism Cases in the Federal Courts (2009)
• Kevin J. Barry (2003-11). "Military Commissions: Trying American Justice". Army Lawyer. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-08-01. Retrieved 2009-08-01.  Check date values in: |date= (help)
• Frederic L. Borch III (2003-11). "Why Military Commissions Are the Proper Forum and Why Terrorists Will Have "Full and Fair" Trials: A Rebuttal to Military Commissions: Trying American Justice". Army Lawyer. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-08-01. Retrieved 2009-08-01.  Check date values in: |date= (help)
• Kevin J. Barry (2003-11). "Editorial Comment: A Response to Why Military Commissions Are the Proper Forum and Why Terrorists Will Have "Full and Fair" Trials". Army Lawyer. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-08-01. Retrieved 2009-08-01.  Check date values in: |date= (help)

fr:Commission militaire de Guantánamo

1. ↑ "American Bar Association Task Force on Terrorism and the law report and recommendations on Military Commissions" (PDF). American Bar Association. January 4, 2002. Retrieved 2007-12-16. 
2. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Citation/CS1/Suggestions' not found.
3. ↑ ^{3.0 3.1 3.2} Glaberson, William (May 2, 2009). "U.S. May Revive Guantánamo Military Courts" (webpage). The New York Times. Retrieved 2009-05-02. 
4. ↑ http://www.calgarysun.com/news/canada/2010/08/10/14975516.html
5. ↑ GQ Magazine August 2007 "The Defense Will Not Rest" by Sean Flynn Page one, fourth paragraph down
6. ↑ "FAQs about the Military Commissions Act". The Center for Victims of Torture. Retrieved 2007-12-17. 
7. ↑ "Military Commission Instruction No. 10" (PDF). United States Department of Defense. March 24, 2006. Retrieved 2007-12-16. 
8. ↑ rcfp.org Feb 28 2004
9. ↑ "Trial Guide for Military Commissions" (PDF). United States Department of Defense. August 17, 2004. Retrieved 2007-12-17. 
10. ↑ Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Myers (March 28, 2002). "Transcript: Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and General Richard Myers, briefed reporters March 28 at the Pentagon". United States Embassy, Canberra. Retrieved 2007-12-17. 
11. ↑ ^{11.0 11.1} "http://www.foreignminister.gov.au/releases/2007/joint_ruddock_hicks.html". Minister for Foreign Affairs (Australia). 2007-02-03. Retrieved 2008-08-11.  External link in |title= (help)
12. ↑ Percival, Jenny (November 4, 2008). "Guantánamo jury jails Bin Laden media chief for life". The Guardian. London. Retrieved February 14, 2010. 
13. ↑ Colson, Deborah. Human Rights First, Another Boycott at Guantánamo, Another Test for the Military Commission System, April 30, 2008
14. ↑ "Three Guantánamo panelists dismissed over bias allegations". USA Today. October 21, 2004. Retrieved 2007-12-17. 
15. ↑ "At Gitmo, still no day in court: How feds avoid hearings for terror suspects — despite Supreme Court ruling". Newsday. June 15, 2005. Retrieved 2007-12-17. 
16. ↑ "U.S. prosecutor in Khadr case blasts sympathetic views of Canadian teen". CBC. January 10, 2006. Retrieved 2007-12-16. ^{[dead link]}
17. ↑ Michelle Shephard (January 2, 2008). "Guantanamo hearings try patience: Underwire bra, extra pen among items unpopular with military overseers at terrorist suspects' trials". Toronto Star. Retrieved 2008-01-04. 
18. ↑ "Closure Of Guantanamo Detention Facilities". Whitehouse.gov. 2009-01-22. Retrieved 2009-01-27. 
19. ↑ "Judge rejects Obama bid to stall trial". NZ Herald - AP. 2009-01-29. Retrieved 2009-02-07. 
20. ↑ "US hi-tech terror court". Hindustan Times. 2010-07-01. Archived from the original on 2010-07-02. The electronic equipment in “Courtroom No 2” is worth four million dollars, according to the US military here who put the total cost of the “multidefendant” court at 12 million dollars.