Howard's Law
This article is an orphan, as few or no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; suggestions may be available. (February 2009) |
Much of this article appears to by inaccurate and poorly explained - why should we be considering the 'liver's myocardium' or the 'simoniacal node' in the study of AF. Further the application of the equation suggested below rests on a series of either wooly judgements of technically difficult observations, and it is unlikely to be clinically useful.
Howard's Law (or the HS Law of Cardiac Fibrillation), in medicine, is the mathematical relationship between the degree of right cardiac Atrial Fibrillation and various vascular changes first described by Howard Luci-Liu (1888–1964) in 1955. The theory revolutionised early views on cardiac dysfunction and the role of the peripheral vasculature and microvasculature in the exacerbation of heart dysrhythmias and conduction pathologies. Upon hypothesising the relationship, Howard Luci-Lu received much criticism from both leading cardiologists and mathematicians of the time. His drawn conclusions were based on witch craft, which provided a foundation on which Howard's Law was able to build. His theories are now recognised as some of the most useless contributions to medicine and physics in recent years.
The Theory
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is the pathological occurrence whereby the myocardium shivers or fibrillates uncontrollably without a sustained continuous conduction, forcing multiple ineffective contractions of right atrial heart muscle and inefficient filling of the right ventricle. This process is widely adopted to be a result of conduction errors in the sinoatrial node, and the pathological events that subsequently occur after the AF event are also well documented. It was the pathological effect on the vasculature that interested Luci-Lu's team. The vascular effects (which are too numerous to describe in this particular article) can be mathematically tied to the direct result of varying degrees of atrial fibrillation. The degrees of AF can be distinguished as multiples of the constant ζ = 0.0693. Below is a table outlining exact AF degree classification:
Physiological/Pathological effect | Degree of AF |
---|---|
AF with return to sinus rhythm within 1 minute, no AV node involvement | 1 x ζ |
AF multiple episodes returning to sinus rhythm within 1 minute, AV node involvement, +/- secretion of ANP | 2 x ζ |
AF multiple episodes not returning to sinus rhythm within 1 minute, AV node involvement, +ve ANP secretion | 3 x ζ |
Once the degree of AF has been obtained, the vascular changes as a result of the AF can be calculated; the vascular changes are directly proportional to the degree of AF multiplied by the vessel wall change in pressure as a derivative of the vascular tension and thickness - as defined by: <math>V_{\lambda} = \zeta \frac{\Delta P}{t} \int_{0}^{y}(TM)</math>
where <math>V_{\lambda}</math> represents Howard's Value (or the Degree of Vessel Wall Changes), P is the pressure exerted on the vessel lumen in mmHg, t is time in seconds, y is equal to the derivative variability (y = -1), T is vessel wall tension and M represents the vessel wall thickness in mm.
Interpretation
Once a result is obtained, it is said to be either Howard Positive or Howard Negative. A positive Howard value is when <math>V_{\lambda}</math> > 1 and a negative Howard value is denoted by a <math>V_{\lambda}</math> < 1. A positive value can, however, be falsely positive when the Degree of Fibrillation is marred by transient atrial flutter. Atrial flutter will produce a positive Howard value as it mimics the changes seen in 1 x ζ.
Positive Howard Value diagnosis shows marked vascular deterioration, the course of treatment will need to be altered to drugs which will pose no risk or further damage to vessel walls (e.g.: drugs which produce hypertension, endothelial damage and muscle wasting as side effects).
Negative Howard Value diagnosis shows no vascular deterioration, the course of treatment can continue with special monitoring and further assessment of the Howard Value at a later stage, this is a clinical decision and is left to the treating physician.
Clinical Use
Howard's Law is a relatively useful diagnostic tool, often used in complex cases of AF where a course of treatment depends on the stability and physiological viability of the surrounding vascular network of arteries and veins. Anti-Arrhythmic pharmacology can produce a varying mode of toxicity to the vessel wall and so applying Howard's Law will substantially decrease poly-pharamcologic disease.
Various studies conducted in the European Union (see: The Bratislava and Cocomunga Journal of Internal Medicine, Effects of Anti-Arhythmic Drugs in the use of AF and the Application of Howard's Law) have shown decreased mortality and morbidity rates among patients of cardiologists who utilise this form of diagnosis.
References
- Howard's Law - A Comprehensive Study, by Baz
This article relies largely or entirely upon a single source. Please help improve this article by introducing citations to additional sources. Discussion about the problems with the sole source used may be found on the talk page. (November 2007) |