Residential treatment center

From Self-sufficiency
Jump to: navigation, search

A residential treatment center (RTC) sometimes called rehab, is a live-in facility providing therapy for substance abuse, mental illness, or other behavioral problems. Residential treatment should, in many cases, be considered the "last-ditch" approach to helping a child with severe problems.[1]

Children and teens

RTCs for adolescents provide behavior modification for patients who present a variety of conditions, ranging from drug abuse to violence to sexual behavioral problems. Different RTCs work with different grades of problems, and so the structure and methods of RTCs varies. Some RTCs are lock-down facilities; that is, the residents are locked inside the premises; however, other RTCs don't lock the residents in.

There are generally two types of residential treatment centers: locked and unlocked. In a locked residential treatment facility, patients movements are severely restricted, usually to a single room or cell. By comparison, an unlocked residential treatment facility allows patients to move about the facility with relative freedom, but they are only allowed to leave the facility under specific conditions. Residential treatment centers should not be confused with residential education programs, which offer an alternative environment for at-risk children to live and learn together outside their homes.

Residential treatment centers for children and adolescents treat multiple conditions from drug and alcohol addictions, to emotional and physical disorders as well as mental illnesses. Various studies on youth in residential treatment centers have found that many children in these facilities have had a history of family-related issues, often including physical or sexual abuse. Along with these issues, many children display aggressive behaviors. Most residential treatment centers cater to troubled teens with ADHD and ADD, family problems, behavioral disorders, educational issues, and behavioral issues that puts them at risk.[2]

Residential treatment centers generally are clinically focused and primarily provide behavior management and treatment for adolescents with serious issues.[3] In contrast, therapeutic boarding schools provide therapy and academics in a residential boarding school setting, employing staffs of social workers, psychologists, and psychiatrists to work with the students on a daily basis. This form of treatment has a goal of academic achievement as well as physical and mental stability in children and young adults.[4] Recent call have occurred to ensure that residential treatment facilities have more input from behavioral psychologists to improve outcmes and lessen unethical practice [5]

Behavioral Interventions

Behavioral interventions has been very helpful in reducing problem behaviors in residential treatment centers [6]. The type of residential (conduct disorder youth versus mental retardation versus psychiatric populations) does not appear to be a factor in the effectiveness of behavioral programming [7] Behavioral intervention has been found to be successful even when medication interventions fail (i.e.,[8] )

Controversy

Disability rights organizations, such as the Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, oppose placement in such programs and call into question the appropriateness and efficacy of such group placements, the failure of such programs to address problems in the child’s home and community environment, the limited or no mental health services offered and substandard educational programs. Concerns specifically related to a specific type of residential treatment center called therapeutic boarding schools include:

  • inappropriate discipline techniques,
  • medical neglect,
  • restricted communication such as lack access to child protection and advocacy hotlines, and
  • lack of monitoring and regulation.

Bazelon promotes community-based services on the basis that they are more effective and less costly than residential placement.[9]

From late 2007 through 2008, a broad coalition of grass roots efforts, prominent medical and psychological organizations that including members of Alliance for the Safe, Therapeutic and Appropriate use of Residential Treatment (ASTART) and the Community Alliance for the Ethical Treatment of Youth (CAFETY), provided testimony and support that led to the creation of the Stop Child Abuse in Residential Programs for Teens Act of 2008 by the United States Congress Committee on Education and Labor[10].

Jon Martin-Crawford and Kathryn Whitehead of CAFETY testified at a hearing of the United States Congress Committee on Education and Labor on April 24, 2008,[11] where they described abusive practices they had experienced at the Family Foundation School and Mission Mountain School, both therapeutic boarding schools.[12][13]

Due to the absence of regulation of these programs by the federal government and because many are not subject to state licensing or monitoring [14], the Federal Trade Commission has issued a guide for parents considering such placement [15]

Research on effectiveness

Studies of different treatment approaches have found that residential treatment is effective for individuals with a long history of addictive behavior or criminal activity.[16][17][18][19] RTCs offer a variety of structured programs used to accommodate their residents' needs.

See also

Related topics
Specific Programs

References

Cite error: Invalid <references> tag; parameter "group" is allowed only.

Use <references />, or <references group="..." />

External links

  • http://www.petersons.com/common/article.asp?id=1751&path=hs.fas.advice&sponsor=1
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) http://www.family.samhsa.gov/main/mhdictionary/r.aspx
  • Ellen Behrens and Kristin Satterfield, Report of Findings from a Multi-Center Study of Youth Outcomes in Private Residential Treatment, Presented at the 114th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans, Louisiana, August 2006
  • Types of Boarding Schools; Boarding School Review: http://www.boardingschoolreview.com/articles/3
  • Hunter, R.D. (2001) Improving Outcomes Requires More, Not Less, From Psychology. The Behavior Analyst Today, 2 (1), 4 -14 BAO
  • James W. Bodfish & Edward A. Konarski (1992). Reducing problem behaviors in a residential unit using structural analysis and staff management procedures: A preliminary study. Behavioral Intervention, 7(3), 225-234
  • Frederick J. Fuoco, P. Scott Lawrence, Janice B. Vernon (1988). Post-treatment effects of token reinforcement, verbal praise, and self-monitoring in a residential psychiatric program. Behavioral Intervention, 3(4), 267-286
  • Luiselli, J.K. & Evans, T.P. (1987). Assessing pharmacological and contingency management interventions with mentally retarded adolescents in a residential treatment program. Behavioral Intervention, 2(3),139-152
  • U.S. Supreme Court to Decide Forest Grove v. T.A.: Parents Should Win, But Bazelon Center Opposes Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, Retrieved May 1, 2009
  • "Stop Child Abuse in Residential Programs for Teens Act of 2008." Official bill language from the U.S. Congress. Retrieved May 1, 2009.
  • "Child Abuse and Deceptive Marketing by Residential Programs for Teens." Official testimony to the U.S. Congress. Retrieved May 1, 2009.
  • "Transcript of testimony of Jon Martin-Crawford." Official transcript from the U.S. Congress. Retrieved May 1, 2009.
  • "Transcript of testimony of Kathryn Whitehead." Official transcript from the U.S. Congress. Retrieved May 1, 2009.
  • Evaluating Private Residential Treatment Programs for Troubled Teens, FTC Urges Caution When Considering 'Boot Camps', FTC Federal Trade Commission, Retrieved May 1, 2009
  • Considering a Private Residential Treatment Program for a Troubled Teen? Questions for Parents and Guardians to Ask, FTC Federal Trade Commission, Retrieved May 1, 2009
  • A National Evaluation of Treatment Outcomes for Cocaine Dependence; D. Dwayne Simpson, PhD; George W. Joe, EdD; Bennett W. Fletcher, PhD; Robert L. Hubbard, PhD; M. Douglas Anglin, PhD; Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56:507-514. Abstract
  • Effectiveness of coerced addiction treatment (alternative consequences) A review of the clinical research; Norman S. Miller M.D. and Joseph A. Flaherty M.D.b.; Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 9-16 (January 2000) Abstract
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NIDA InfoFacts: Treatment Approaches for Drug Addiction. Aug. 2007. 18 Oct. 2007.
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment: A Research Based Guide. Feb. 2005. 18 Oct. 2007.