Difference between revisions of "Radioactive scrap metal"

Latest revision as of 09:13, 20 September 2010

Radioactive scrap metal is the situation when radioactive material enters the metal recycling process and contaminates scrap metal.

Overview

A lost source accident^[1][2] is one where a radioactive object is lost or stolen. Such objects often end up in the scrap metal industry, as people mistake them for harmless bits of metal.^[3] The International Atomic Energy Agency has provided guides for scrap metal collectors on what a sealed source might look like.^[4][5] The best known example of this type of event is the Goiânia accident, in Brazil.

While some lost source accidents have not involved the scrap metal industry, they are still good examples of the likely scale and scope of a lost source accident. For example, the Red Army left sources behind in Lilo. Another case occurred at Yanango where a radiography source was lost and at Gilan, Iran a radiography source harmed a welder ^[6].

Radioactive sources have a wide range of uses in medicine and industry, it is common for the design (and nature) of a source to be tailored to the application so it is impossible to state with confidence what the "typical" source looks like or contains. For instance antistatic devices include beta and alpha emitters. For instance polonium containing devices have been used to eliminate static electricity such devices include paint spraying equipment.^[7] An overview of the gamma sources used for radiography can be seen at Radiographic equipment, and it is reasonable to consider this to be a good overview of small to moderate gamma sources.

Examples

Tammiku (Estonia)

In Tammiku (Estonia) a group of three men were responsible for a similar incident: they burgled a radioactive waste store to steal scrap metal. One of them picked up a metal pipe and placed it in his pocket. This metal pipe was a very strong ¹³⁷Cs source which gave a high localised dose to the man’s leg (1800 Sv local, 4 Sv whole body). He was admitted a few days later to hospital where he claimed to have had an accident in the woods. He died shortly after as a result of whole body irradiation from the source. Before going to the hospital, he left the source in his house where it then irradiated other members of his family and his dog (which died as a result). His son suffered a localised radiation burn (local dose of 25 Sv, whole body 3.6 Gy) which resulted in the amputation of fingers, when he inadvertently handled the source when looking for tools to repair his bicycle. When a medical doctor saw these burns it was understood that an ionising radiation accident was in progress. The man's wife got a 500 mSv dose while his mother got a 2.25 Sv dose.^[8][9][10]

It is interesting to note that the scrap metal industry was involved twice in this: the caesium source being originally found in a shipment of scrap metal which was brought into the country (at that point it was thought to be a ⁶⁰Co source based on half thickness measurements). The source was placed in the radioactive waste store for safekeeping, which was subsequently entered by the men who were intent on stealing scrap metal.

Samut Prakarn (Thailand)

At Samut Prakarn a 15.7 TBq (425 Ci) cobalt-60 teletherapy source was lost ^[11], attempts were made by some scrap metal workers to recycle the metal. During this time humans were subject to irradation by the source.

It was found that at the edge of the scrap yard the dose rate was about 1 to 10 mSv hr⁻¹. The exact location of the source in the scrap yard was determined using a fluorescent screen which acted as a scintillator. This was held on the end of a long pole.

Isotopes and metals

¹³⁷Cs vs ⁶⁰Co (solubility in water)

The clean up operation for the Goiânia accident^[12] was difficult because the source was opened, and the fact that the active material was water soluble. The event in Mexico wherein cobalt-60 was spilled in an almost identical event led to a very different pattern of contamination since the cobalt in such a source is normally in the form of cobalt metal alloyed with some nickel to improve the mechanical properties of the active metal. If such a source is abused, then the cobalt metal fragments do not tend to dissolve in water or become very mobile. If a cobalt or iridium source is lost at a ferrous metal scrapyard then it is often the case that the source will enter a furnace, the radioactive metal will melt and contaminate the steel from this furnace. In the United States, some buildings have been demolished because of the level of cobalt-60 in the steel used to make them. Also, some of the steel which was rendered radioactive in the Mexican event was used to make table legs.

Source melting

Ferrous scrap

In the case of a caesium source being melted in an electric arc furnace used for steel scrap, it is more likely that the caesium will contaminate the fly ash or dust from the furnace, while radium is likely to stay in the ash or slag. The United States Environmental Protection Agency provide data about the fate of different contaminating elements in a scrap furnace ^[13]. Four different fates for the element exist: the element can stay in the metal (as with cobalt and ruthenium); the element can enter the slag (as in lanthanides, actinides and radium); the element can enter the furnace dust or fly ash (as with caesium), which accounts for around 5%; or the element can leave the furnace and pass through the bag house to enter the air (as with iodine).

In the case of some high value scrap metals it is possible to decontaminate scrap metal, but this is best done long before the metal goes to a scrap yard.^[14][15]

Aluminium scrap

It is normal to place silicon, aluminium scrap and flux in a furnace. This is heated to form molten aluminium. From the furnace three main streams are obtained, metal product, dross (metal oxides and halides which is skimmed off the molten metal product) and off gases which go to the baghouse. The cooled waste gasses are then allowed out into the environment.

Copper scrap

It is normal that good-quality scrap copper, such as that from a nuclear plant, is refined in one furnace before being refined further in an electrochemical process. The furnace generates impure metal, slag, dust and gases. The dust accumulates in a bag house, while the gases are vented to the atmosphere. The impure metal from the furnace may be refined in an electrochemical process.

If the copper refinery includes an electrochemical process after the furnace, then unwanted elements are removed from the impure metal and deposited as anode slime.

Gold scrap

In the early part of the 20th century in the USA, gold which was contaminated with lead-210 entered the jewelry industry. This was from gold seeds which had held radon-222 which had been melted down (after the radon had decayed). The daughters of the radon are still radioactive.^[16]

Sealed vs. unsealed source

In the Tammiku event, where a caesium source of similar strength was stolen, the accident site was easy to clean because the source remained sealed. All that needed to be done was to pick the source up, place it in a lead pot and transport this to the radioactive waste store. It is noteworthy that in that case the source recovery workers wore rubber gloves, but more importantly failed to use tongs. Gamma rays obey the inverse square law so by slightly increasing the distance between the recovery worker and the source the dose rate experienced by the worker can be reduced. In the recovery of lost sources the International Atomic Energy Agency consider that it is best to plan the recovery first, and to consider using a crane or other device to place shielding (such as pallet of bricks or a concrete block) near the source to allow the recovery worker to walk up to it while being protected by the added shielding.

See also

• Nuclear crime
• Radioactive waste

References

1. ↑ P Ortiz, V Friedrich, J Wheatley and M Oresegun, Lost & Found Dangers - Orphan Radiation Sources Raise Global Concerns, IAEA Bulletin 41: 18 (1999)
2. ↑ Greta Joy Dicus, USA Perspectives - Safety & Security of Radioactive Sources, IAEA Bulletin 41: 22 (1999)
3. ↑ D M Smith, Radioactive Material in Scrap Metal - The UK Approach, Health & Safety Executive, Midlands Region Specialist Group
4. ↑ Could that be a sealed radioactive source?, IAEA
5. ↑ Reducing Risks in the Scrap Metal Industry, IAEA
6. ↑ The Radiological Accident in Gilan, IAEA (2002)
7. ↑ College breaches radioactive regulations, BBC News, 12 March 2002
8. ↑ Tammiku stolen source, 1994
9. ↑ The Radiological Accident at Tammiku, IAEA
10. ↑ P. Ortiz, M. Oresegun, J. Wheatley, Lessons from Major Radiation Accidents, IAEA
11. ↑ The Radiological Accident in Samut Prakarn, IAEA
12. ↑ The Radiological Accident in Goiânia, IAEA Vienna (1988)
13. ↑ [1]
14. ↑ [2]
15. ↑ http://www.earthvision.net/industryprograms/pdfs/dd/30170.pdf
16. ↑ Poster Issued by the New York Department of Health (ca. 1981)